Community. Driven. Weather. Data. | Always Ad-Free | Developer FriendlyChecking statusDiscord
WxAlerts.org, Community Driven Weather Data
Support us
Sign in
Lesson 04 of 1025 minBeyond SKYWARN

What a dBZ is

A logarithmic scale, a conversion that is an assumption rather than a measurement, and the difference between the two reflectivity products your app offers.

By the end of this lesson
M9.4.aExplain what dBZ is and why the scale is logarithmic.
M9.4.bExplain what a Z-R relationship does and why more than one exists.
M9.4.cAssociate dBZ ranges with precipitation intensity and type.
M9.4.dDistinguish base from composite reflectivity and state the pitfall.

The Z, and the d and the B

How much of the radar pulse bounced back from whatever the beam was passing through on that tilt. It is the familiar green-to-red precipitation picture, and it describes what is up in the beam, not what is reaching the ground. spans an enormous range: the returned power from drizzle and from a hail core differ by a factor of millions. So it is expressed on a logarithmic scale, in decibels relative to a reference. That is what The unit radar reflectivity is measured in. Roughly, 20 is drizzle, 40 is a proper thunderstorm core and 60 or more usually means hail. is, and it has one consequence that matters constantly.

From reflectivity to rainfall, which is an assumption

The radar measures returned power. It does not measure rainfall. Converting one to the other requires an assumption about the size distribution of the drops, and that assumption is called a The assumed conversion from radar reflectivity to rainfall rate. Several exist because the right one depends on the drop size distribution, which the radar cannot independently determine..

RelationshipUsed for
Z = 300 R^1.4The NWS default for convective rainfall
Z = 250 R^1.2Tropical systems, where the drop distribution is different
Z = 200 R^1.6Marshall-Palmer, the classic stratiform relationship

Three different answers from the same returned power. Which is correct depends on what kind of rain it actually is, which the radar cannot independently determine, which is why forecast offices switch relationships by regime.

One detail worth having, because it explains something you will see: rainfall algorithms limit the reflectivity they will accept, somewhere around the low 50s dBZ. Above that the return is probably hail rather than rain, and feeding it into a rainfall relationship would invent a downpour that is not happening.

Reading the scale

RoughlyUsually means
Below 20 dBZDrizzle, light snow, cloud, or non-weather targets
20 to 40 dBZStratiform rain. Steady, widespread, unremarkable
40 to 55 dBZConvective rain. Heavy, showery, thunderstorm cores
Above about 60 dBZHail is likely somewhere in that column

Approximate and overlapping, and deliberately so: the boundaries are not sharp and anybody quoting them to the decibel has misunderstood the scale.

Base against composite

Base reflectivity
What the radar saw on one elevation tilt, usually the lowest. A real slice through the atmosphere at a known height, which climbs with range exactly as lesson 2 described.
Composite reflectivity
The maximum value found anywhere in the vertical column, collapsed onto a map. Useful for finding the strongest part of a storm quickly, and it tells you nothing about what height that value came from.
Knowledge checkNot graded · the exam draws a fresh variant of this item

Your app shows a 62 dBZ core on composite reflectivity over your town. What can you legitimately conclude?

Two words in the question are doing work: "composite", and "column".
Sources for this lessonNOAA JetStream, the online school for weather: radarNWS Warning Decision Training Division, radar and warning guidanceNWS, radar frequently asked questions and the reflectivity scale

← Module overview
Sign in to save your progress
Next lessonShapes worth knowing30 min · goes beyond the standard classContinue